Close Please enter your Username and Password

My Blog

Welcome to my blog!

the thing I don't understand about hate groups
Posted:Aug 18, 2017 5:37 pm
Last Updated:Aug 18, 2017 6:36 pm

Did you ever wonder ( and yes I'm being serious here) why the government can't stop a group like ISIS? The answer given usually is it has no leader/have no organizational structure/they claim we don't know who these people are.

Yet ironically we can snap a pic of Bubba at a white supremacist rally and track his ass down within hours. By the end of the day he was fired from his job at the "superdog"???
( probably did him a favor)

The group Anti fa(scist) claims no leader/claims no structure and the media claims it is impossible to track these people down. They dress in all black/wear masks/ditch the black clothing when the police actually decide to do their job and make some arrest.
These people gather through social media and basically just show up in masses.

So why do the alt right groups hold rallies/obtain the proper permits to protest/why don symbols that easily define you as a member of a group..I mean why is the kkk still wearing hoods/robes? you'd think if nothing else it makes them easy targets ( not only for alt left groups but also the police who might not like their message.
Why go through legal channels

Why be so open and let every media source film your face..?

Would it be more effective to dress like normal folks/wear a mask and just hold signs in an unorganized/unannounced protest...

Why would any group just put themselves out there like that...We learned that when people think they are anonymous, their true hate comes out .
So you'd think their numbers would increase as they ability to track hate group members gets harder
Meeting the same person on various sites
Posted:Aug 18, 2017 4:06 am
Last Updated:Aug 18, 2017 2:14 pm

Now I know we all travel around in small circles...but..have you ever run into the same people on various personal ad sites...

and if you did were they the "same".. By this did they give off the same persona..

an example: perhaps on here they are master so and so and they want you to be this or that or do this and that...

and then on another site they are simply "henry" or " betty" and they are just looking to cuddle..

it makes you wonder which person your really getting...Master asshat..leader of the seven seas of pluto or the "cuddler"

I just sorta find this ironic...came across this one Dom who was wanting to own a dude and have his wear diapers etc etc etc and then bitched because he couldn't find any "real" slaves..

ran across the same dude on another site ( not exactly nilla)..more of a gay personal ad site and all that diaper talk and bs wasn't there in his ad. No mention of if you dated this dude would the diaper talk eventually come out or is all that a by product of him being on a kinky site?
if you need a is a video for you
Posted:Aug 17, 2017 7:20 pm
Last Updated:Aug 18, 2017 7:02 am

I know i've been hard on you all this past week....but that doesn't compare to this tapir prepared to laugh...

sorry still don't know how to do direct linkage on here..but damn that tapir pigs needs his own jockey commercial... wish my dick hung that low
oh the delicious irony of snowflake companies like disney
Posted:Aug 17, 2017 4:47 am
Last Updated:Aug 18, 2017 6:42 pm

kinda ironic that disney featured this world wide photo shoot to "empower" princesses.

They featured lil girls dressed as disney princess doing all sorts of things like getting muddy playing soccer or studying to be a CEO etc etc etc...and then labeled this empowering.

Don't get me wrong.. I have no problem with empowered girls.. I have no problem with the photo shoot..

BUT Disney is the one that pushes the whole princess bs stereotype on women for years and has made billions from it.. Show me another company that says women are princesses...

Now they want to be pc and tweek the definition of what a princess is?? still selling the same line of bs and continuing the money train..fuck beauty and the beast make a billion dollars itself..and that heavily pushes the whole princess bullshit.. ( and it stars an ardent feminist for christ's sake...)

She can still be a princess.. but now she is an empowered princess?? really disney...
still looks like the same ole same ole where it is about who you are/what you look like and what prince you'll some day pine over.

This would be like disney ( that owns espn) saying wow look at all those lil boys that want to be football players/continuing the stereotype that all boys are rough/aggressive hell even violent.???.

and then having them plant a garden wearing football gear or having them sit in a CEO's chair in football attire...and entitling the pics "empowering!"

that wouldn't be "empowering " to a boy...cause your still continuing the stereotype of the boy playing football...seeing him as other things like a farmer or a ceo does nothing to dispel the other stereotypical sexist bs...

and disney is to fucking blame.....and still making $$$ pushing these stereotypes...

it sorta reminds me of snowflake universities that rally for freedom of speech.. but only if it agrees with their own personal agenda.. other views still need to be banned
your out of your element donny
Posted:Aug 17, 2017 4:27 am
Last Updated:Aug 17, 2017 11:15 am

that is a quote from movie the big lebowski

nothing worse than blogging about a subject and then having trolls jump on and demand you fact check yourself...what the fuck guys am I suddenly encyclopedia Britannica?

Should every fucking thing I write be a 100 percent balls on accurate ( complete with references and footnoted) ( fuck we don't even expect this of journalist) so why expect that from a blogger...

and no I don't have the time nor energy to get multiple sources to prove something like OMG general lee didn't actually own slaves....I'm not hear for argue with you about the tree if you can't get passed the fucking forest.
The point of that particular blog was if we are gonna remove statues of the south then why not remove statues of our founding fathers ( who owned slaves).

But you cluster fucks want to get into arguments over the fine fucking details.. you remind me of those old cranky fuckers that read western novels and then bitch because the author dare mentions a colt and that didn't come into being until the next decade.

WHO FUCKING CARES! get a life..

what's next,, you gonna debate that I don't know lifestyle subject matter and want to debate a certain model or playtoy..

and honestly if you want a debate, then debate in a civil manner. No need to take personal swipes at someone blogging at 5 am in the fucking morning
should someone be fired for a posting on social media
Posted:Aug 16, 2017 7:25 pm
Last Updated:Aug 17, 2017 5:55 pm

I was just curious as to what you all though...

We've seen plenty of examples where people have been fired based on their posting on social media/we've all seen where people have been fired for expressing their first amendment rights in protesting.
Hell google fired an employee and facebook shut down an employee site because it dared to support trump.I know OMGGG how dare they?/?

So should a company be allowed to fire you for posting your opinion ( esp if it is in opposition to the companies' political leanings like facebbok) on your own page or exercising your right to protest.

NOW I get some companies not wanting to be directly linked to extremist groups and fired said employee when his face was plastered all over the world. ( er dumb ass if your gonna be in a hate group atleast wear something that covers your face like the anti fac groups do...duhhh)
But what if the script was flipped..say you were out protesting to save the bunnies and you happened to work for some testing facility....should they be allowed to can your ass.

Sure you have freedom of speech ( but that only protects you from the gov backlash))..

Should protesting alone be grounds for termination? and why is it different if you belong to an extremist group # alt right or alt left. Being fired is well being fired..goodbye..welcome to the unemployment mr kapernick!

why is one allotted freedom of speech but not the other??
taking down a statue
Posted:Aug 16, 2017 5:12 pm
Last Updated:Aug 17, 2017 7:36 pm

just curious if you thought certain statues should be removed.

I think it is easy for someone to say fuck yeah..take the general lee statue down..

But should general/ president grant be removed from the 50 dollar bill then....general grant committed atrocities against various indian tribes out west/ general grant actually owned slaves/grant was an he was an incompetent president

General Lee? nope not a slave owner/graduate of west point /.

How about removing abe lincoln from the 5 dollar bill/removing his monument.. lincoln actually didn't have a problem with slavery and would have kept it as an institution if it meant restoring the union. Plus his emancipation proclamation only applied to the slaves in the south. He didn't end slavery over night and allowed it to continue after the war

How about washington or thomas jefferson? both slave owners.. both presidents that could have stopped the practice of slavery in america..but did nothing and got rich off their slave run farms.

So why are we so fast to remove a statue of general lee but flock to wash dc to see the lincoln/washington and jefferson monuments...

How is one a racist and the others..well founding fathers..
can you really play with someone that doesn't have an interest in you
Posted:Aug 16, 2017 4:43 am
Last Updated:Aug 17, 2017 6:25 am

I wondered if you ever met someone on line that looked ideal.. your checking off your boxes versus their boxes.. it seems like everything lines up nicely.

Yet when you chat/email this person it almost seems like they really aren't into is almost like your bothering them/they answer with brief one line sentences etc.

I honestly don't have time for someone that doesn't have an "interest" in me ( whether that is attraction/sexually/playwise or as a person...

I could care less if all the stars are aligned and this person appears to be a good play partner/the right one for me/could care less if we geek out over certain aspects of the lifestyle...

if a person isn't into me then why even bother....had this happen to me twice now..

your production has to always outweight your bullshit
Posted:Aug 16, 2017 4:11 am
Last Updated:Aug 16, 2017 8:12 am

I nothing else I'd love to teach the children of the world this simply lesson. Always make sure your production out weights your bullshit/your baggage...
or in barney stinson terms ( the hottness has to out weight the crazy).

Classic case is the sports athlete: Tiger woods...20 yrs ago the police would have just taken tiger woods home that night without filling out a police report...
NOW?... the toxicology report comes out and Tiger ( who claimed that he just misread the dosage of his new prescription) was literally falling asleep at the wheel. He had pain killers mixed in with sleep aids and anti anxiety medication ... oh yeah and he was also smoking some weed..( heard it was the "good shit" too)

20 yrs ago noone would have cared.. No sponsor would have dropped tiger as a client...
Now we all watched that video of him slurring his speech and acting stupid..
Kinda hard now to sign him to some endorsement deal..

Take the case of collin kapernick....despite the protest and anti cop crap...some team would have signed his ass if he had some can be a distraction as long as you are a star..

Get a few years down the road and you lose a few steps and bammmm your ass is now on the curb.

And hell even when your young and a "star".. you better keep your bullshit under wraps because you can't let your baggage overlap your production... i.e. the league doesn't care who you are if your accused of abusing women and getting into drunken bar fights etc.
a history lesson on the nazis
Posted:Aug 14, 2017 7:32 pm
Last Updated:Aug 16, 2017 4:41 pm

Being a huge history fan of WWII...I thought I would take a brief moment and really explain what a "nazi" is...Seeing how we heard that term battered around so much in the press yesterday.

First off the germans/hilter never used the term. It was the brain child of an english journalist at the time. It really was considered an insult. It was an abbreviated way of saying " Nationalsozialismus"...the german term for national socialism.

I'm not sure if alot of people know the "nazis" were socialist.
HOLY SHIT!!!!!!! does bernie sanders know this??

...the party's' official name was the national socialist german worker's party..
no shit kids ..look it up..hilter was a yeahhh!!!! mind blown!!!! bitches
At the time most americans didn't know who was worse.. the nazis or the commies..hell time mag made hilter their man of the year...

And for all the youngsters here..hilter..yep hilter was legally voted into office..surprise!!!!

Unlike communism ( or modern day socialism found on most college campuses)..the germans rejected the idea of class warfare/maraxism ( so much for taxing the 1 percent(ers/ no operation occupy wall st bullshit for them)
. Instead they thought the people needed to look inward and sacrifice for the greater good of the country. After losing wwI the german people got wrapped up in the flag and embraced nationalism instead.

People have to understand that germany after ww1 was a shithole...the economy sucked/half of the country was under direct control of the french/work was hard to come by...
Adolph Hilter was basically a modern day college student/vagabond...he couldn't find work/he slept in cheap hostile/he engaged in alot of exploratory se just saying)..
He basically was a day laborer...he encountered many communist on the job sites and he enjoyed verbally sparring with them
( and no I'm not trying to make hitler out to be some sympathetic character/a warm and fuzzy hobo..just giving people insight into this man)
So when life sucks it is easy to blame another race/gender/religion for your problems.
And to be honest for a moment..NOONE liked the Jews at this period of time...henry ford of the famed for motor company was a huge anti Semite.
The jews were hated through out europe..

So lets bring this to modern times....

the economy sucks/the middle class is broken and yes there is a generation of white males lost...yep 10 fucking years of economic depression will do that( thanks bush/obama)

So if your living in your mom's basement at 26 and working for wallymart, it is easy to jump online and bitch about the illegals or obama etc. It is easy to blame others for your failures.

BUT I will add that it doesn't help that the media keeps insisting that white people have this magical "privilege" tell that to some dude living in his mom's basement.
Trust me I grew up on welfare and noone opened any doors for me..being white didn't help me one damn bit. Fuck I ate the free government cheese..and you know your poor when you ate that shit. cops will follow you if you drive a shitty beater of a car..and nope it isn't just a black thing. Poor is poor..doesn't matter what the color of your skin is. I've been pulled over for bullshit reason for driving while poor.

So in this modern days it is easy to hook up with people that feel the same way/easy to join groups and organizations.

it is easy to blame your faults on others.. it's easier to stick with people of your own race. it is easy to be caught up in a neo nazi type group...

BUT I will add that it is equally easy to join an anti fascist group..

ironically we throw around the term neo nazi, but not neo commie??? aren't both equally bad..seems like both are feeding off one another.

Yet alot of younger people really embrace the concepts of socialism/class warfare..that someone else should be paying for their benefits.. it's the same crap lennon pushed all those years ago.

And somehow we are now shocked to see neo nazis fight commies a few days ago?

To link to this blog (likesmatureones) use [blog likesmatureones] in your messages.